Home
/
Industries
/
Financial services
Quantum readiness for financial services

Modernize cryptography without interrupting the
movement of money.

Map cryptographic dependencies across customer channels, identity, payments, trading, core systems, cloud and third parties, then sequence change around resilience rather than around the org chart.

Plan a pilot
See the regulatory picture
Three exposure lenses

The same cryptography can carry confidentiality, transaction and resilience risk

The same key can be a confidentiality problem, an integrity problem or a continuity problem depending on the flow it sits in. Priority has to know which.

01 · DATA

Long-lived confidentiality

Customer records, identity data, legal archives and strategic information may stay valuable long beyond today's cryptography.

  • Data class and retention
  • External exposure path
  • HNDL prioritization
02 · TRUST

Transaction integrity

Payments, trading, messaging and identity rely on signatures, certificates and trust paths that must change without breaking confidence.

  • Signing and authentication
  • Protocol dependencies
  • Counterparty readiness
03 · RESILIENCE

Operational continuity

Migration decisions must account for service criticality, change windows, fallback behavior and regulatory reporting obligations.

  • Business-service tier
  • Blast radius
  • Validation and rollback
Follow the transaction

Cryptographic dependencies cross organizational boundaries

Map the flow, not just the asset. A single payment may traverse a mobile client, identity service, API gateway, fraud platform, processor, rail and core ledger, each with different owners and different migration readiness.

Migration wave planning

Sequence by shared dependency and operating risk

Group change around real systems and counterparties instead of treating every cryptographic object as an independent ticket.

Regulatory context

What the G7, DORA and PCI DSS each ask of cryptography

Framework
What it asks of cryptography
Evidence Qinsight supports
G7 Cyber Expert Group
Financial sector PQC roadmap published January 2026, co-chaired by the US Treasury and Bank of England, targeting critical systems around 2030 to 2032
Inventory scope, dependency mapping and readiness trend
DORA
ICT risk management including cryptographic controls and third-party dependency mapping
Dependency graph across internal and vendor systems
PCI DSS 4.0
Strong cryptography on cardholder data transmission and a documented inventory of cryptographic architecture
Protocol and cipher evidence with deployment context
FINRA
Guidance recommending cryptographic inventory and migration planning. Explicitly does not create new legal requirements
Inventory and migration planning evidence
OSFI B-13
Technology and cyber risk management for federally regulated Canadian institutions
Coverage reporting and change history
Stakeholder views

One record, five accountabilities

The buying committee is wide in financial services. The same evidence base should serve all of it.

CISO

Portfolio exposure

Coverage, concentration, readiness trend and unresolved decisions.

CRYPTO

Mechanism detail

Algorithms, parameters, trust paths, protocols and observations.

TECH OWNER

Change impact

Affected service, dependencies, test criteria and owners.

OP RISK

Resilience rationale

Criticality, downtime tolerance, fallback and control evidence.

AUDIT

Traceable evidence

Scope, source, timestamp, assumptions, history and approvals.

Start with one business service

Scope a bounded pilot around a real payment or identity flow and leave with a dependency map you can act on.